Difference between revisions of "FishBowl"

From Open Pattern Repository for Online Learning Systems
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Edited source)
(Edited patlet)
Line 14: Line 14:
}}
}}


MOOCs do not have the capacity to entertain personal interactions to share experiences, expectations, concerns and any other issue that may be valuable to both teachers and learners.  Conduct a FishBowl session that is intimate yet recorded and is shown via webcast live, wherein participants reflect on the experiences from last week's activities while other participants who watch can also react to it and tutors in the session can respond to participants' questions<ref name="Mor2015"/><ref name="Mornd"/>.
Simulate intimate interaction between teacher and students in a large scale online course by broadcasting sessions where selected students act as proxies for the cohort<ref name="Mor2015"/><ref name="Mornd"/>.


==Context==
==Context==

Revision as of 10:59, 21 June 2016


FishBowl
Contributors
Last modification June 21, 2016
Source Mor and Warburton (2015)[1]; Mor and Warburton (n.d.)[2]
Pattern formats OPR Alexandrian
Usability
Learning domain
Stakeholders

Simulate intimate interaction between teacher and students in a large scale online course by broadcasting sessions where selected students act as proxies for the cohort[1][2].

Context

Problem

Forces

Solution

Consequences

Benefits

Liabilities

Evidence

Literature

Discussion

Data

Applied evaluation

Related patterns

Example

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Mor, Y. & Warburton, S. (2015). Practical Patterns for Active and Collaborative MOOCs: Checkpoints, FishBowl and See Do Share. eLearning Papers (42).
  2. 2.0 2.1 Mor, Y., & Warburton, S. (n.d.). Design patterns-MOOC Design Patterns. Retrieved from http://www.moocdesign.cde.london.ac.uk/outputs/patterns June 7, 2016.