Difference between revisions of "Blended Evaluation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Added category) |
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Added category) |
||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Design_patterns]] [[Category:Patlet]]<!-- List of other categories the design pattern belongs to. The syntax for linking to a category is: [[Category:<Name of category]] --> | [[Category:Design_patterns]] [[Category:Patlet]] [[Category:Practical Design Patterns for Teaching and Learning with Technology]] [[Category:Traditional Classroom]] [[Category: Online Learning System]]<!-- List of other categories the design pattern belongs to. The syntax for linking to a category is: [[Category:<Name of category]] --> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:39, 12 May 2017
| Blended Evaluation | |
| Contributors | Oswald Comber |
|---|---|
| Last modification | May 12, 2017 |
| Source | Comber (2014)[1] |
| Pattern formats | OPR Alexandrian |
| Usability | |
| Learning domain | |
| Stakeholders | |
Blended evaluation is employed to consider a mix of self evaluation, peer evaluation and instructor evaluation in the assessment phases of a course. While the process is more demanding for all involved, it caters for increased student involvement and transparency of the evaluation and grading process.
Context
Problem
Forces
Solution
Consequences
Benefits
Liabilities
Evidence
Literature
Discussion
Data
Applied evaluation
Related patterns
Example
References
- ↑ Comber, O. (2014). Pattern: Blended Evaluation. In Mor, Y., Mellar, H., Warburton, S., & Winters, N. (Eds.). Practical design patterns for teaching and learning with technology (pp. 293-299). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.