Difference between revisions of "Buffers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Edited link of related pattern) |
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Edited related patterns) |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
==Related patterns== | ==Related patterns== | ||
An alternative to directly answering questions would be to use a | An alternative to directly answering questions would be to use a {{Patternlink|Question Parking Space}}<ref name="Köppe2013a">Köppe, C., & Schalken-Pinkster, J. (2013). [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2725697 Lecture design patterns: improving interactivity]. In Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (p. 23). The Hillside Group.</ref> | ||
==Example== | ==Example== |
Revision as of 13:07, 29 July 2016
Buffers | |
Contributors | |
---|---|
Last modification | July 29, 2016 |
Source | Fricke and Völter (2000)[1] |
Pattern formats | OPR Alexandrian |
Usability | |
Learning domain | |
Stakeholders |
Include buffers in your planning for a lecture so that you have time for reacting on unforeseen problems, questions, and topics[1].
Context
Problem
Forces
Solution
Consequences
Benefits
Liabilities
Evidence
Literature
Discussion
Data
Applied evaluation
Related patterns
An alternative to directly answering questions would be to use a Question Parking Space[2]
Example
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Fricke, A., & Völter, M. (2000). SEMINARS: A Pedagogical Pattern Language about teaching seminars effectively. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, EuroPLoP 2000 (pp. 87-128). New York:ACM.
- ↑ Köppe, C., & Schalken-Pinkster, J. (2013). Lecture design patterns: improving interactivity. In Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (p. 23). The Hillside Group.