Difference between revisions of "Feedback on Feedback"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Created patlet for pattern) |
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Added category) |
||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Design_patterns]] <!-- List of other categories the design pattern belongs to. The syntax for linking to a category is: [[Category:<Name of category]] --> | [[Category:Design_patterns]] [[Category:Patlet]]<!-- List of other categories the design pattern belongs to. The syntax for linking to a category is: [[Category:<Name of category]] --> | ||
Revision as of 13:20, 4 May 2017
| Feedback on Feedback | |
| Contributors | Denise Whitelock, Harvey Mellar |
|---|---|
| Last modification | May 4, 2017 |
| Source | Whitelock & Mellar (2014)[1] |
| Pattern formats | OPR Alexandrian |
| Usability | |
| Learning domain | |
| Stakeholders | |
Feedback given to learners should provide opportunities to improve the learning experience. It should comprise constructive feedback to improve learning as well as socio-emotive feedback. Tutors in large courses often resort to grading devoid of effective feedback. To support them in improving their feedback, they need effective feedback on the feedback they give.
Context
Problem
Forces
Solution
Consequences
Benefits
Liabilities
Evidence
Literature
Discussion
Data
Applied evaluation
Related patterns
Example
References
- ↑ Whitelock, D. & Mellar, H. (2014). Pattern: Blended Evaluation. In Mor, Y., Mellar, H., Warburton, S., & Winters, N. (Eds.). Practical design patterns for teaching and learning with technology (pp. 311-313). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.