Difference between revisions of "Student Debate"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Added category) |
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Added category) |
||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Design_patterns]] [[Category:Patlet]]<!-- List of other categories the design pattern belongs to. The syntax for linking to a category is: [[Category:<Name of category]] --> | [[Category:Design_patterns]] [[Category:Patlet]] [[Category:Lecture Design Patterns]] [[Category:Interactivity Improvement Patterns]] [[Category:Traditional Classroom]]<!-- List of other categories the design pattern belongs to. The syntax for linking to a category is: [[Category:<Name of category]] --> | ||
Revision as of 13:32, 16 May 2017
| Student Debate | |
| Contributors | Christian Köppe, Michel Portier, René Bakker, Stijn Hoppenbrouwers |
|---|---|
| Last modification | May 16, 2017 |
| Source | Köppe, Portier, Bakker, & Hoppenbrouwers (2015)[1] |
| Pattern formats | OPR Alexandrian |
| Usability | |
| Learning domain | |
| Stakeholders | |
Give a small number of diverse or even contradicting statements to students, have them prepare and present a plea for their statement and use these presentations as starting point for deeper discussions of the topic.[1]
Context
Problem
Forces
Solution
Consequences
Benefits
Liabilities
Evidence
Literature
Discussion
Data
Applied evaluation
Related patterns
Example
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Köppe, C., Portier, M., Bakker, R., & Hoppenbrouwers, S. (2015). Lecture Design Patterns: More Interactivity Improvement Patterns. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (PLoP 2015). Pittsburgh, USA.