Difference between revisions of "Sugar-Coating"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Added contributors) |
Sfrancisco (talk | contribs) (Added category) |
||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Design_patterns]] <!-- List of other categories the design pattern belongs to. The syntax for linking to a category is: [[Category:<Name of category]] --> | [[Category:Design_patterns]] [[Category:Patlet]]<!-- List of other categories the design pattern belongs to. The syntax for linking to a category is: [[Category:<Name of category]] --> | ||
Revision as of 13:27, 5 May 2017
| Sugar-Coating | |
| Contributors | Yishay Mor |
|---|---|
| Last modification | May 5, 2017 |
| Source | Mor (2008)[1] |
| Pattern formats | OPR Alexandrian |
| Usability | |
| Learning domain | |
| Stakeholders | |
This is an anti-pattern. Mathematical (or any other subject) matter is injected into a game in a disconnected way, so that the game is the sugar-coating used to help the learner swallow the bitter content.
As a result the game loses its appeal, and the learner receives the message that the educational content is inherently un-enjoyable.
Context
Problem
Forces
Solution
Consequences
Benefits
Liabilities
Evidence
Literature
Discussion
Data
Applied evaluation
Related patterns
Example
References
- ↑ Patlet published in Mor, Y. (2008). Guess my X and other Techno-pedagogical Patterns: Toward a Language of Patterns for Teaching and Learning Mathematics. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs. Irsee, Germany.